header-logo header-logo

No-deal Brexit for solicitors

12 November 2018
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Increasing fear of a no-deal Brexit has led the Law Society to issue a series of papers guiding solicitors on steps they can take to minimise the risks in family law, data and civil disputes.

The series launched last week with four papers on providing legal services in the EU, civil and commercial disputes, data and family law.

For example, the Brussels II Regulation helps families resolve disputes about divorce and the custody of children where they involve parties in more than one EU state. Under the regulation, EU courts automatically recognise judgments delivered in other EU states on matrimonial and parental responsibility.

However, Brussels II will no longer apply to the UK once we leave the EU. Neither will the Maintenance Regulation, which helps ensure the payment of maintenance in cross border situations.

On financial disputes between businesses and individuals, Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said: ‘There are currently no international conventions that can be used to help and the result is that the enforcement of these judgments will depend on the national law or the possibility of relying on old bilateral conventions from the 1920s or 1930s.

‘Furthermore, it’s not clear, for example, what will happen with ongoing cases if we exit the EU without a deal. Our presumption is that as there is no reciprocity and no agreement on ongoing cases, even the judgments from these cases are not enforceable under the reciprocal EU rules. 

‘And while, at the moment, court judgments in Britain are recognised in EU countries and vice versa, once we leave there is a risk parallel cases may be taken up in multiple jurisdictions. Not to mention that the parties will need two legal teams to run these cases as the qualified lawyers are no longer able to represent their clients in each other’s jurisdictions.  

'This will push the cost of litigation beyond the reach of many small and medium-sized businesses.’

Blacklaws added: ‘What seems certain is that anything cross border is likely to be more expensive and more complex—our members and the general public need to be ready for that.’

As Brexit negotiations continued this week, media outlets reported that it was looking increasingly unlikely a draft deal would be agreed this month.

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll