header-logo header-logo

No to expert regulation

13 November 2014
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"No political will or money” for independent accrediting body

No further regulation of expert witnesses is required, according to a leading barrister.

Speaking at the 20th Annual Bond Solon Expert Witness Conference, Tim Dutton QC said it would be “difficult” to set up a separate regulatory entity for experts, and problems would arise particularly where litigants-in-person are involved.

Dutton, a former Bar Council chair, shared his concerns about unscrupulous experts in a BBC Panorama investigation that found several experts apparently prepared to field evidence in support of a litigant despite knowing they had broken the law. However, he spoke against regulation at the conference.

Mark Solon, director of Bond Solon, says: “The problem with regulation is that under every stone of regulation there lurks an investigator, because as soon as a standard is imposed someone has to ensure that that standard is maintained.

“It is all very well for existing professional bodies to police their members and I would support directions that they maintain lists of their approved experts. Problems arise with one-off experts, those who are instructed on a specific issue in one case but may never be an expert again. There cannot be an accrediting body in such a circumstance.

“It is necessary for the instructing solicitor to exercise due diligence in assessing the suitability of the expert, for cross-examining counsel to test that ability and, ultimately, for the judge to decide the weight of that evidence. There is no political will or money to have an independent accrediting body.”

However, the Ministry of Justice has proposed both a new accreditation scheme and fixed fees for expert reports in whiplash cases—proposals which cancel the need for each other out, according to Chris Pamplin, editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses, writing in NLJ this week.

Issue: 7630 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll