header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011 / Jonathan De Rohan
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No fighting back?

Are mesothelioma claims a lost cause for defendants? Jonathan de Rohan reports

Although mesothelioma is almost always caused by the inhalation of asbestos fibres there is a possibility that some cases are “idiopathic”, ie attributable to an unknown cause. Further, a significant proportion of those who contract mesothelioma have no record of occupational exposure to asbestos. The likelihood is that in their cases the disease results from the inhalation of asbestos dust in the atmosphere. The condition may be caused by the inhalation of a single fibre, a few fibres or many fibres, but the more fibres that are inhaled, the greater the risk of contracting it. Like lung cancer, it is an indivisible condition in that, once initiated, further exposure to asbestos fibres will have no causative effect. It is invariably fatal.

Rock of uncertainty

The present state of medical knowledge is such that there is no way of identifying, even on the balance of probabilities, the source of the fibre or fibres which caused a victim’s malignant tumour. This scientific ignorance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll