header-logo header-logo

30 October 2014 / Peter Stevens
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

No fishing allowed?

stevens

The European Court of Justice has further narrowed the definition of personal data, says Peter Stevens

In July 2014, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) gave a preliminary ruling on the meaning of “personal data” in two joined cases referred to it by the Dutch courts. The technical guidance published by the UK Information Commissioner’s Office may need to be amended in the light of this decision, which narrows the definition of “personal data”, and so limits the scope of subject access requests.

Personal data & subject access requests

Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA 1998) provides that, with some exceptions, on written request an individual is entitled to be told whether a data controller is processing any personal data of which he is the subject. If so, he is entitled to have communicated to him, in intelligible form, the information which constitutes that personal data and any information available to the data controller as to its source, and to be told the purposes for which they are being processed and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll