header-logo header-logo

19 May 2017 / Warren Wooldridge
Issue: 7746 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

No half measures

nlj_7746_woolridge

Agile working requires a real culture change, says Warren Wooldridge

The concept of agile working is fast defining the next generation of law firms that threaten to bloody the nose of the traditional status quo. Being able to work where, when and how you want is of course only one element that differentiates the new from the old but interestingly it is the one that traditional law firms have deemed the easiest to defend. By somehow portraying themselves as supporters of agile working it is hoped they will blunt one of the key advantages enjoyed by newer law firm models.

Paying lip service

Paying lip service to existing staff and allowing them to work the occasional day from home or by knocking down the partitioning walls to create an open plan office is missing the point. True agile working is a real cultural change. Allowing lawyers to work in this way from day one has some serious benefits. There is no stigma attached to working from home. There is no feeling of somehow missing out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll