header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 January 2017 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7728 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No justice without representation...or costs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

The profession should unite to condemn proposals to take damages from injured people, says Patrick Allen

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has launched yet another consultation paper about raising the small claims limit for personal injury claims (Reforming the soft tissue injury (whiplash) claims process). On my count this is the seventh such consultation since 1991.

All previous consultations came to the same conclusion—the small claims track is not suitable for personal injury (PI) claims because the no cost rule means claimants will not have legal representation. This will put them at an insuperable disadvantage in an area of complex law, evidence and procedure, where the defendants will always be represented by experienced insurance claims handlers and lawyers. Unrepresented claimants will abandon their claims in the face of a denial of liability or will be tempted to under settle, having no idea of the true value of their claim.

So why another consultation on the same topic? Insurers, who have a long record of financial support for the Tory party, have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll