header-logo header-logo

02 November 2012 / Victoria Beel , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No limits

Should there be a civil claim time limit, ask Richard Scorer & Victoria Beel

True justice cannot be time-limited, but courts hearing allegations many decades later can face difficulties in assessing allegations fairly if witnesses have died, memories have faded and documents have gone missing. A claim arising from the systematic torture and abuse suffered in Kenya under the colonial administration in the 1950s & 1960s was subject to a preliminary High Court judgment on limitation on 5 October. Mr Justice McCombe granted the claimants permission to bring their cases 50 years outside the primary limitation period. The court exercised its discretion under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), which permits the limitation period to be waived where it is equitable to do so.

It is accepted by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) that the claimants were subject to serious mistreatment during their time in screening camps in Kenya during the Mau Mau insurgency. The abuses included castration, rape and violent beatings – the most vile torture imaginable. The FCO

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll