header-logo header-logo

No limits

02 November 2012 / Victoria Beel , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Should there be a civil claim time limit, ask Richard Scorer & Victoria Beel

True justice cannot be time-limited, but courts hearing allegations many decades later can face difficulties in assessing allegations fairly if witnesses have died, memories have faded and documents have gone missing. A claim arising from the systematic torture and abuse suffered in Kenya under the colonial administration in the 1950s & 1960s was subject to a preliminary High Court judgment on limitation on 5 October. Mr Justice McCombe granted the claimants permission to bring their cases 50 years outside the primary limitation period. The court exercised its discretion under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), which permits the limitation period to be waived where it is equitable to do so.

It is accepted by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) that the claimants were subject to serious mistreatment during their time in screening camps in Kenya during the Mau Mau insurgency. The abuses included castration, rape and violent beatings – the most vile torture imaginable. The FCO

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll