header-logo header-logo

No limits

02 November 2012 / Victoria Beel , Richard Scorer
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Should there be a civil claim time limit, ask Richard Scorer & Victoria Beel

True justice cannot be time-limited, but courts hearing allegations many decades later can face difficulties in assessing allegations fairly if witnesses have died, memories have faded and documents have gone missing. A claim arising from the systematic torture and abuse suffered in Kenya under the colonial administration in the 1950s & 1960s was subject to a preliminary High Court judgment on limitation on 5 October. Mr Justice McCombe granted the claimants permission to bring their cases 50 years outside the primary limitation period. The court exercised its discretion under s 33 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980), which permits the limitation period to be waived where it is equitable to do so.

It is accepted by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) that the claimants were subject to serious mistreatment during their time in screening camps in Kenya during the Mau Mau insurgency. The abuses included castration, rape and violent beatings – the most vile torture imaginable. The FCO

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll