header-logo header-logo

18 January 2007 / Edward Hetherington
Issue: 7256 / Categories: Features , Media , Human rights
printer mail-detail

No more kiss and tell?

Does a wronged spouse owe a duty of confidence to the third party adulterer? asks Edward Hetherington

The decision of Mr Justice Eady in the High Court to grant an interim injunction in CC v AB [2006] EWHC 3083 (QB), [2006] All ER (D) 39 (Dec) seems to raise the bar in terms of the protection of privacy in English law. Surprisingly, the High Court recognised the possibility that a spouse whose partner had committed adultery could owe a duty of confidence to the third party adulterer.

Case facts

The claimant (CC), a high-profile figure in the sports world, had an affair lasting several months with a married woman (N). He was awarded an injunction to restrain AB, N’s husband, from revealing his identity through the media. CC is also married, and attempting to repair his relationship with his wife. Neither the claimant, nor N, wanted details of their affair made public. Further, CC’s wife was suffering from a stress-related illness, and publication of the details of his affair may have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll