header-logo header-logo

No need for the fat police

23 March 2007 / Tracey Elliott
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Parents should not be criminalised for having fat children, says Tracey Elliott

Kelly Banham, in her article, “Is the law a fat ass?” (NLJ, 23 Febru­ary 2007, p 269) suggests that the government should consider “prosecuting parents for child cruelty in allowing their children to become obese for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition”. She compares the government’s current approach to child obesity with the law’s approach towards animal cruelty and suggests that the criminal law offers more protection to animals than it does to children.

Certainly the case involving the Benton brothers and Rusty, the fat labrador, marks the first conviction of pet owners for the offence of causing unnecessary suffering by allowing their animals to become obese (Protection of Animals Act 1911 (PAA 1911), s 1(1)(a) as amended by the Protection of Animals (Amendment) Act 2000). It remains to be seen if the RSPCA will start routinely prosecuting pet owners for permitting their animals to become obese. If it does, there will be a large number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll