header-logo header-logo

No need for the fat police

23 March 2007 / Tracey Elliott
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Parents should not be criminalised for having fat children, says Tracey Elliott

Kelly Banham, in her article, “Is the law a fat ass?” (NLJ, 23 Febru­ary 2007, p 269) suggests that the government should consider “prosecuting parents for child cruelty in allowing their children to become obese for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition”. She compares the government’s current approach to child obesity with the law’s approach towards animal cruelty and suggests that the criminal law offers more protection to animals than it does to children.

Certainly the case involving the Benton brothers and Rusty, the fat labrador, marks the first conviction of pet owners for the offence of causing unnecessary suffering by allowing their animals to become obese (Protection of Animals Act 1911 (PAA 1911), s 1(1)(a) as amended by the Protection of Animals (Amendment) Act 2000). It remains to be seen if the RSPCA will start routinely prosecuting pet owners for permitting their animals to become obese. If it does, there will be a large number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll