header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / Tracey Elliott
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Features , Public , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

No need for the fat police

Parents should not be criminalised for having fat children, says Tracey Elliott

Kelly Banham, in her article, “Is the law a fat ass?” (NLJ, 23 Febru­ary 2007, p 269) suggests that the government should consider “prosecuting parents for child cruelty in allowing their children to become obese for reasons other than a diagnosed medical condition”. She compares the government’s current approach to child obesity with the law’s approach towards animal cruelty and suggests that the criminal law offers more protection to animals than it does to children.

Certainly the case involving the Benton brothers and Rusty, the fat labrador, marks the first conviction of pet owners for the offence of causing unnecessary suffering by allowing their animals to become obese (Protection of Animals Act 1911 (PAA 1911), s 1(1)(a) as amended by the Protection of Animals (Amendment) Act 2000). It remains to be seen if the RSPCA will start routinely prosecuting pet owners for permitting their animals to become obese. If it does, there will be a large number of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll