header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No pot of gold

Injured claimants should not be subsidising the insurance industry, says Karl Tonks

In February 2010 the then government said it was “persuaded that an Employers’ Liability Insurance Bureau (ELIB) should form part of the package of measures to improve the lives of those who are unable to trace an old employer or their insurer”. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in its consultation, Accessing Compensation, said that the ELIB would be a fund of last resort to ensure that injured workers would receive their rightful compensation. That consultation closed on 5 May 2010, the day before the general election. As a consequence of the election result, the responses landed on the desk of the incoming coalition. Now it is more than 18 months since the new government came to power and yet we still have not had a response to the consultation.

Difficulties exacerbated

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has said previously that “insurers remain fully committed to paying fair compensation claimants as quickly as possible”. However, the insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll