header-logo header-logo

16 December 2011 / Karl Tonks
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

No pot of gold

Injured claimants should not be subsidising the insurance industry, says Karl Tonks

In February 2010 the then government said it was “persuaded that an Employers’ Liability Insurance Bureau (ELIB) should form part of the package of measures to improve the lives of those who are unable to trace an old employer or their insurer”. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in its consultation, Accessing Compensation, said that the ELIB would be a fund of last resort to ensure that injured workers would receive their rightful compensation. That consultation closed on 5 May 2010, the day before the general election. As a consequence of the election result, the responses landed on the desk of the incoming coalition. Now it is more than 18 months since the new government came to power and yet we still have not had a response to the consultation.

Difficulties exacerbated

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) has said previously that “insurers remain fully committed to paying fair compensation claimants as quickly as possible”. However, the insurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll