header-logo header-logo

No safe haven?

28 March 2019 / Ruth Mullen
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Features , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

Ruth Mullen reports on a lacklustre response to the plight of migrant women who suffer domestic violence—the draft Domestic Abuse Bill

Legislation introduced in 2002 acknowledged that migrant women often face a stark choice between staying in an abusive relationship or being deported. To date, only migrant women who are in the UK with Limited Leave on the partner route are eligible to apply for indefinite leave to remain.

If they can show that they are destitute, then the exorbitant Home Office fee of more than £2,000 will be waived. If they meet the means tested requirements for legal aid, they will be entitled to free legal representation. If not, however, they will be subject to private legal fees ranging into the thousands and that does not include the Home Office fee.

Expanding definitions

The draft Domestic Abuse Bill promises new protections with the statutory definition of abuse being extended to include the subtle forms of coercive and controlling abuse that many victims experience. It also acknowledges that abuse is not limited to couples.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll