header-logo header-logo

No set off

12 June 2008 / Robert Weir KC
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Arnup has clarified how courts approach fatal accident claims, says Robert Weir

In Arnup v M W White Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 447, [2008] All ER (D) 73 (May), the Court of Appeal had to decide whether, in assessing damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended, payments made shortly after death to a widow by a defendant and third party should be set off the claim for damages. At first instance, the judge had decided that, in principle, they should. This judgment led to a period of uncertainty with insurance companies arguing in numerous cases that similar payments should be set off against the claims for damages. The Court of Appeal swept aside this uncertainty with a clear declaration that benefits from whatever source are to be disregarded in calculating damages in fatal accident litigation.

Mr Arnup worked as yard foreman at a plant recycling waste paper. On 22 December 2003 he was inside a hogger machine trying to unblock a jam with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll