header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Robert Weir KC
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

No set off

Arnup has clarified how courts approach fatal accident claims, says Robert Weir

In Arnup v M W White Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 447, [2008] All ER (D) 73 (May), the Court of Appeal had to decide whether, in assessing damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended, payments made shortly after death to a widow by a defendant and third party should be set off the claim for damages. At first instance, the judge had decided that, in principle, they should. This judgment led to a period of uncertainty with insurance companies arguing in numerous cases that similar payments should be set off against the claims for damages. The Court of Appeal swept aside this uncertainty with a clear declaration that benefits from whatever source are to be disregarded in calculating damages in fatal accident litigation.

Mr Arnup worked as yard foreman at a plant recycling waste paper. On 22 December 2003 he was inside a hogger machine trying to unblock a jam with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll