header-logo header-logo

No set off

12 June 2008 / Robert Weir KC
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Arnup has clarified how courts approach fatal accident claims, says Robert Weir

In Arnup v M W White Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 447, [2008] All ER (D) 73 (May), the Court of Appeal had to decide whether, in assessing damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended, payments made shortly after death to a widow by a defendant and third party should be set off the claim for damages. At first instance, the judge had decided that, in principle, they should. This judgment led to a period of uncertainty with insurance companies arguing in numerous cases that similar payments should be set off against the claims for damages. The Court of Appeal swept aside this uncertainty with a clear declaration that benefits from whatever source are to be disregarded in calculating damages in fatal accident litigation.

Mr Arnup worked as yard foreman at a plant recycling waste paper. On 22 December 2003 he was inside a hogger machine trying to unblock a jam with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll