header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008 / Robert Weir KC
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Features , Damages , Personal injury , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

No set off

Arnup has clarified how courts approach fatal accident claims, says Robert Weir

In Arnup v M W White Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 447, [2008] All ER (D) 73 (May), the Court of Appeal had to decide whether, in assessing damages under the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) as amended, payments made shortly after death to a widow by a defendant and third party should be set off the claim for damages. At first instance, the judge had decided that, in principle, they should. This judgment led to a period of uncertainty with insurance companies arguing in numerous cases that similar payments should be set off against the claims for damages. The Court of Appeal swept aside this uncertainty with a clear declaration that benefits from whatever source are to be disregarded in calculating damages in fatal accident litigation.

Mr Arnup worked as yard foreman at a plant recycling waste paper. On 22 December 2003 he was inside a hogger machine trying to unblock a jam with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll