header-logo header-logo

23 July 2009 / Mark Parkhouse , Andrew Jackson
Issue: 7379 / Categories: Opinion , Regulatory , Banking
printer mail-detail

No time for bad law

Pragmatism, not fast law, will help
the UK exit the recession say
Mark Parkhouse & Andrew Jackson

Inadequate banking regulation in the UK has, arguably, led to a shrinking economy, increased unemployment and an increase in business failures. In the wake of the recession, economists are debating whom to blame, where to shift the power, and what tools to use to prevent future failures.

Alistair Darling is sticking by the strengths and weaknesses of the tripartite system. This division of labour allocates responsibilities between the Financial Services Authority (FSA), the Bank of England and the Treasury. Each institution has come under criticism for a lack of effective communication prior to the recession, and for not taking sufficient preventative action early enough.

Whereas Mervyn King politely blames the government for the downturn, and appears willing to initiate a campaign for greater centralised power in the Bank of England. Mr King has spoken out over the “extraordinary” budget deficit and the failure of the Treasury to consult with him over reform

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll