header-logo header-logo

No time for hesitation

09 September 2010 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong...

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong. Andrew Parker explains why

It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared at the launch of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report, that the “time for discussion and debate is over”. That certainly did not stop the debate, but has the report had the desired impact?

In terms of the need for reform of civil litigation costs, nothing has changed. High success fees and high after the event (ATE) insurance premiums, often equalling or exceeding the amount in dispute, still abound.  Conditional fee agreements are still “the major contributor to disproportionate costs in civil litigation in England & Wales” (Jackson LJ’s final report p xvi).

The case for fixed costs on all fast track cases remains as powerful now as it was when Lord Woolf first proposed the concept in 1995.  The introduction of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) process for Low

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll