header-logo header-logo

No time for hesitation

09 September 2010 / Andrew Parker
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong...

Jackson: the case for reform remains strong. Andrew Parker explains why

It is now nearly nine months since the master of the rolls, Lord Neuberger, declared at the launch of Lord Justice Jackson’s final report, that the “time for discussion and debate is over”. That certainly did not stop the debate, but has the report had the desired impact?

In terms of the need for reform of civil litigation costs, nothing has changed. High success fees and high after the event (ATE) insurance premiums, often equalling or exceeding the amount in dispute, still abound.  Conditional fee agreements are still “the major contributor to disproportionate costs in civil litigation in England & Wales” (Jackson LJ’s final report p xvi).

The case for fixed costs on all fast track cases remains as powerful now as it was when Lord Woolf first proposed the concept in 1995.  The introduction of the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) process for Low

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll