header-logo header-logo

Non-justiciability

20 June 2014
Issue: 7611 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Shergill and others v Khaira and others [2014] UKSC 33, [2014] All ER (D) 83 (Jun)

Non-justiciability referred to a case where an issue was said to be inherently unsuitable for judicial determination by reason only of its subject-matter. There were two categories. The first comprised cases where the issue in question was beyond the constitutional competence assigned to the courts under the separation of powers. The second category comprised claims or defences which were based neither on private legal rights or obligations, nor on reviewable matters of public law. The law treated unincorporated religious communities as voluntary associations. It viewed the constitution of a voluntary religious association as a civil contract as it did the contract of association of a secular body. The courts would not adjudicate on the decisions of an association’s governing bodies unless there was a question of infringement of a civil right or interest. However, disputes about doctrine or liturgy were non-justiciable if they did not as a consequence engage civil rights or interests or reviewable questions of public law. The governing bodies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll