header-logo header-logo

Not so heavenly creatures

22 February 2013 / James Wilson
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

James Wilson remembers one of New Zealand’s most infamous true crimes

Peter Jackson’s film of The Hobbit is likely to be one of the most popular films of recent times. Previously in these pages, I wrote about his earlier work, Braindead, which was the subject of litigation thanks to a rather thin-skinned viewer (“An open & shut case?”). Jackson’s “breakthrough” film was Heavenly Creatures, which was based on one of his native New Zealand’s most infamous true crimes, the Parker-Hulme murder of 1954.

Gruesome twosome

Juliette Hulme and Pauline Parker were schoolgirls in Christchurch in the early 1950s. They formed an intensely close personal friendship, and spent much time together inventing their own fantasy world. Much speculation has since occurred as to whether their relationship was sexual; either way there is no doubt they became extremely close, to the increasing consternation of their respective parents. Eventually it was announced that Parker’s family would be moving overseas. The girls were horrified at the prospect of separation—to the point where they resorted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

NLJ Career Profile: Francis Ho, City of London Law Society

Francis Ho, Charles Russell Speechlys partner, was recently appointed chair of the Construction Law Committee of the City of London Law Society. He discusses the challenges of learning to lead, the importance of professional ethics, and the power of the written word, withNLJ

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
back-to-top-scroll