header-logo header-logo

26 April 2013
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Not so small

The court can now “track down” a civil claim without the consent of the parties by amendment to CPR 27.7...

The court can now “track down” a civil claim without the consent of the parties by amendment to CPR 27.7. This appears to mean, for example, that a claim for £12,000 could be allocated to the small claims track whether the parties like it or not. Are we likely to find that claims which are only modestly over the new normal small claims £10,000 limit or modestly over the £1,000 limit for personal injury claims will be tracked down? Does the new regime not disadvantage a party who has used lawyers believing that his costs would be recoverable if he won only to find that he is limited to small claims restricted costs?

The removal of CPR 27.7(3)—which had required the parties’ consent to track down from fast to small claims—has given greater flexibility to district judges on allocation. Even so, it is generally unlikely that a claim will be tracked down purely on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll