header-logo header-logo

01 December 2021
Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Notes on e-bundles

Lawyers have been advised to keep electronic court bundles clearly labelled and brief, in general guidance issued by the judiciary
Lawyers are advised to give thought to the number of bundles required―‘it is usually better to have a single hearing e-bundle…rather than multiple bundles’. The guidance, issued this week by the Senior Presiding Judge, President of the Family Division and Judge-in-charge of Live Services, asks that electronic court bundles be in pdf format, numbered by computer-generated numbering and no greater than 300dpi resolution so that it doesn’t slow down scrolling and rendering.

It gives directions on how to add new pages to the bundle after it has been submitted, so the judge is not left confused, and gives clear instructions on how the filename should be written. Unrepresented litigants are asked to comply as far as they can. Moreover, the represented party may want to offer help. The guidance states: ‘If the other party is represented then that party should consider offering to prepare the bundle.’ 

View the guidance here

Issue: 7959 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll