header-logo header-logo

07 October 2016 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Nothing in common

nlj_7717_greer

Cohabitating couples do not have the same rights as married couples & cannot rely on protection from “common law marriage”, says Sarah Greer

  • “Common law marriage” is not recognised by the courts in England and Wales.
  • Cohabiting couples should be advised to agree shares in the family home at the outset and to record this formally, whether on the relevant Land Registry forms or by a declaration of trust.
  • They should also be advised on the implications of owning property as tenants in common and on the importance of making a will if they co-own property in this way.
  • Cohabitation agreements are also a useful possibility, provided that both parties obtain independent legal advice.

In July the Office for National Statistics published Population Statistics by Marital Status and Living Arrangements; England and Wales 2002-2015. This showed that the percentage of cohabiting couples had increased from 6.8% of the total population in 2002 to 9.5 % in 2015, reflecting a corresponding decrease in married couples: from 54.8% in 2002 to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll