header-logo header-logo

Nothing in common

07 October 2016 / Sarah Greer
Issue: 7717 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7717_greer

Cohabitating couples do not have the same rights as married couples & cannot rely on protection from “common law marriage”, says Sarah Greer

  • “Common law marriage” is not recognised by the courts in England and Wales.
  • Cohabiting couples should be advised to agree shares in the family home at the outset and to record this formally, whether on the relevant Land Registry forms or by a declaration of trust.
  • They should also be advised on the implications of owning property as tenants in common and on the importance of making a will if they co-own property in this way.
  • Cohabitation agreements are also a useful possibility, provided that both parties obtain independent legal advice.

In July the Office for National Statistics published Population Statistics by Marital Status and Living Arrangements; England and Wales 2002-2015. This showed that the percentage of cohabiting couples had increased from 6.8% of the total population in 2002 to 9.5 % in 2015, reflecting a corresponding decrease in married couples: from 54.8% in 2002 to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll