header-logo header-logo

Nuptial agreements: preparation matters

07 July 2023 / Sarah Scriven
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail
129527
Nuptial agreements: Sarah Scriven runs through the key points to consider now, to avoid disputes later
  • Relevant case law dealing with pre- and post-nuptial agreements and essential points to include when drafting a nuptial agreement.

Nuptial agreements, whether pre- or post-, have the same status in law. Usually, they set out how the parties want their assets divided if they later separate or divorce, and may also deal with how income is to be treated during the marriage and post-separation.

Nuptial agreements have historically been the preserve of wealthier couples, either entering into a subsequent marriage, with the intention of protecting existing wealth for themselves or their children, or younger couples who wish to protect future wealth, such as inheritances, gifts from family or income streams that are destined to improve.

Nuptial agreements are not currently legally binding and cannot be enforced. Instead, they are evidence of intentions. Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] All ER (D) 186 (Oct) has been the leading case on nuptial agreements since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll