header-logo header-logo

Nuptial agreements: preparation matters

07 July 2023 / Sarah Scriven
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail
129527
Nuptial agreements: Sarah Scriven runs through the key points to consider now, to avoid disputes later
  • Relevant case law dealing with pre- and post-nuptial agreements and essential points to include when drafting a nuptial agreement.

Nuptial agreements, whether pre- or post-, have the same status in law. Usually, they set out how the parties want their assets divided if they later separate or divorce, and may also deal with how income is to be treated during the marriage and post-separation.

Nuptial agreements have historically been the preserve of wealthier couples, either entering into a subsequent marriage, with the intention of protecting existing wealth for themselves or their children, or younger couples who wish to protect future wealth, such as inheritances, gifts from family or income streams that are destined to improve.

Nuptial agreements are not currently legally binding and cannot be enforced. Instead, they are evidence of intentions. Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] All ER (D) 186 (Oct) has been the leading case on nuptial agreements since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll