header-logo header-logo

Nuptial agreements: preparation matters

07 July 2023 / Sarah Scriven
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail
129527
Nuptial agreements: Sarah Scriven runs through the key points to consider now, to avoid disputes later
  • Relevant case law dealing with pre- and post-nuptial agreements and essential points to include when drafting a nuptial agreement.

Nuptial agreements, whether pre- or post-, have the same status in law. Usually, they set out how the parties want their assets divided if they later separate or divorce, and may also deal with how income is to be treated during the marriage and post-separation.

Nuptial agreements have historically been the preserve of wealthier couples, either entering into a subsequent marriage, with the intention of protecting existing wealth for themselves or their children, or younger couples who wish to protect future wealth, such as inheritances, gifts from family or income streams that are destined to improve.

Nuptial agreements are not currently legally binding and cannot be enforced. Instead, they are evidence of intentions. Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] All ER (D) 186 (Oct) has been the leading case on nuptial agreements since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll