header-logo header-logo

07 July 2023 / Sarah Scriven
Issue: 8032 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Nuptial agreements: preparation matters

129527
Nuptial agreements: Sarah Scriven runs through the key points to consider now, to avoid disputes later
  • Relevant case law dealing with pre- and post-nuptial agreements and essential points to include when drafting a nuptial agreement.

Nuptial agreements, whether pre- or post-, have the same status in law. Usually, they set out how the parties want their assets divided if they later separate or divorce, and may also deal with how income is to be treated during the marriage and post-separation.

Nuptial agreements have historically been the preserve of wealthier couples, either entering into a subsequent marriage, with the intention of protecting existing wealth for themselves or their children, or younger couples who wish to protect future wealth, such as inheritances, gifts from family or income streams that are destined to improve.

Nuptial agreements are not currently legally binding and cannot be enforced. Instead, they are evidence of intentions. Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42, [2010] All ER (D) 186 (Oct) has been the leading case on nuptial agreements since

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll