header-logo header-logo

Official receiver—Status—Whether exercising judicial function

11 July 2013
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Howard) v Official Receiver [2013] EWHC 1839 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 73 (Jul)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester), Stadlen J, 28 June 2013

A decision by the official receiver revoking a debt relief order is one that is made in the exercise of a judicial function, and is therefore not subject to the public sector equality duty in s 149 of the Equality Act 2010.

Ben McCormack (instructed by Oldham Citizens Advice Bureau) for the claimant. Scott Redpath (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendant.

In May 2011, the claimant applied for and was granted a debt relief order (DRO). The claimant contended that she was a person with severe and long-standing health problems, which rendered her “disabled” for the purposes of s 6 of and Sch 1 to Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010). In December 2011, the defendant official receiver decided to revoke the DRO on the ground that the claimant’s declared income would materially exceed the threshold allowed for monthly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll