header-logo header-logo

The Ogden conundrum

13 November 2014 / David Regan
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
regan_0

When & how should the Ogden reduction factor be discounted, asks David Regan

The calculation of damages for future loss in cases of personal injury can never be an exact science. Chancery colleagues frequently shudder at the broadness of the brush applied even to the most sizeable awards. However, a degree of approximation is inevitable in cases of tortious loss—ungoverned by contract—stretching from years to a lifetime into the future. This can only be only magnified by the youth of the claimant, or the uncertainty of their future condition, likely career path or care needs.

Future loss

For more than 20 years, the court has used the Ogden tables as a basis for calculating awards for future loss. The tables provide a multiplier which takes account of mortality, corrected for age and sex, and the rate of return, discounted for accelerated receipt. The tables do not of course determine the claimant’s precise life expectancy, but are based on the mean life expectancy of those in the relevant population group. They have been a very

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll