header-logo header-logo

13 November 2014 / David Regan
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Ogden conundrum

regan_0

When & how should the Ogden reduction factor be discounted, asks David Regan

The calculation of damages for future loss in cases of personal injury can never be an exact science. Chancery colleagues frequently shudder at the broadness of the brush applied even to the most sizeable awards. However, a degree of approximation is inevitable in cases of tortious loss—ungoverned by contract—stretching from years to a lifetime into the future. This can only be only magnified by the youth of the claimant, or the uncertainty of their future condition, likely career path or care needs.

Future loss

For more than 20 years, the court has used the Ogden tables as a basis for calculating awards for future loss. The tables provide a multiplier which takes account of mortality, corrected for age and sex, and the rate of return, discounted for accelerated receipt. The tables do not of course determine the claimant’s precise life expectancy, but are based on the mean life expectancy of those in the relevant population group. They have been a very

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll