header-logo header-logo

13 November 2014 / David Regan
Issue: 7630 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The Ogden conundrum

regan_0

When & how should the Ogden reduction factor be discounted, asks David Regan

The calculation of damages for future loss in cases of personal injury can never be an exact science. Chancery colleagues frequently shudder at the broadness of the brush applied even to the most sizeable awards. However, a degree of approximation is inevitable in cases of tortious loss—ungoverned by contract—stretching from years to a lifetime into the future. This can only be only magnified by the youth of the claimant, or the uncertainty of their future condition, likely career path or care needs.

Future loss

For more than 20 years, the court has used the Ogden tables as a basis for calculating awards for future loss. The tables provide a multiplier which takes account of mortality, corrected for age and sex, and the rate of return, discounted for accelerated receipt. The tables do not of course determine the claimant’s precise life expectancy, but are based on the mean life expectancy of those in the relevant population group. They have been a very

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll