header-logo header-logo

Ombudsman changing the rules

10 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Legal Ombudsman has launched proposals that would allow it to become an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) entity—and give clients a longer time to lodge complaints.

From 1 October 2015, under EU legislation, legal services providers must “signpost” consumers to an ADR entity that is competent to handle their complaint. In order to be compliant with the ADR Regulations, the Legal Ombudsman needs to change its rules, hence the consultation.

Under the ADR Regulations, the entity can refuse to deal with a complaint if it is brought more than 12 months after the trader tells the consumer it cannot resolve their complaint.

Currently, consumers must bring their complaint within six months of being told in writing by their lawyer to take it to the Legal Ombudsman, or within 12 months if that time span is specified in the lawyer’s letter.

The consultation also proposes changes to the grounds on which the Legal Ombudsman can refuse to handle complaints.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll