header-logo header-logo

10 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ombudsman changing the rules

The Legal Ombudsman has launched proposals that would allow it to become an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) entity—and give clients a longer time to lodge complaints.

From 1 October 2015, under EU legislation, legal services providers must “signpost” consumers to an ADR entity that is competent to handle their complaint. In order to be compliant with the ADR Regulations, the Legal Ombudsman needs to change its rules, hence the consultation.

Under the ADR Regulations, the entity can refuse to deal with a complaint if it is brought more than 12 months after the trader tells the consumer it cannot resolve their complaint.

Currently, consumers must bring their complaint within six months of being told in writing by their lawyer to take it to the Legal Ombudsman, or within 12 months if that time span is specified in the lawyer’s letter.

The consultation also proposes changes to the grounds on which the Legal Ombudsman can refuse to handle complaints.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll