header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

On judging

241897

Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on his years in the judicial foothills

  • Judging is an intellectually demanding craft shaped by flawed legislation, uncertain authority and human judgment.

Judging is unique. It differs from decision-making in every other sphere. Of course, it shares some common characteristics, but in process and method it is distinctive. It mostly takes place in public. There is oral and written argument by each side conducted by trained professionals. The decision must be supported by full and detailed reasons. There are elaborate rules and principles that must be followed that govern the evidence on which the decision must be based, the procedures that must be followed and the law that must be expounded, followed and applied. In particular, there are rules and methods of statutory interpretation and of precedent. Finally, the judgment may be subject to review or appeal by a higher court and intense scrutiny, especially by lawyers and scholars. The judgment lies at the heart of our common law system. Judging is arguably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll