header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

On judging

241897

Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on his years in the judicial foothills

  • Judging is an intellectually demanding craft shaped by flawed legislation, uncertain authority and human judgment.

Judging is unique. It differs from decision-making in every other sphere. Of course, it shares some common characteristics, but in process and method it is distinctive. It mostly takes place in public. There is oral and written argument by each side conducted by trained professionals. The decision must be supported by full and detailed reasons. There are elaborate rules and principles that must be followed that govern the evidence on which the decision must be based, the procedures that must be followed and the law that must be expounded, followed and applied. In particular, there are rules and methods of statutory interpretation and of precedent. Finally, the judgment may be subject to review or appeal by a higher court and intense scrutiny, especially by lawyers and scholars. The judgment lies at the heart of our common law system. Judging is arguably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll