header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail

On judging

241897

Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on his years in the judicial foothills

  • Judging is an intellectually demanding craft shaped by flawed legislation, uncertain authority and human judgment.

Judging is unique. It differs from decision-making in every other sphere. Of course, it shares some common characteristics, but in process and method it is distinctive. It mostly takes place in public. There is oral and written argument by each side conducted by trained professionals. The decision must be supported by full and detailed reasons. There are elaborate rules and principles that must be followed that govern the evidence on which the decision must be based, the procedures that must be followed and the law that must be expounded, followed and applied. In particular, there are rules and methods of statutory interpretation and of precedent. Finally, the judgment may be subject to review or appeal by a higher court and intense scrutiny, especially by lawyers and scholars. The judgment lies at the heart of our common law system. Judging is arguably more intellectually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll