header-logo header-logo

On judging

06 February 2026 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
241897

Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on his years in the judicial foothills

  • Judging is an intellectually demanding craft shaped by flawed legislation, uncertain authority and human judgment.

Judging is unique. It differs from decision-making in every other sphere. Of course, it shares some common characteristics, but in process and method it is distinctive. It mostly takes place in public. There is oral and written argument by each side conducted by trained professionals. The decision must be supported by full and detailed reasons. There are elaborate rules and principles that must be followed that govern the evidence on which the decision must be based, the procedures that must be followed and the law that must be expounded, followed and applied. In particular, there are rules and methods of statutory interpretation and of precedent. Finally, the judgment may be subject to review or appeal by a higher court and intense scrutiny, especially by lawyers and scholars. The judgment lies at the heart of our common law system. Judging is arguably

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll