header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 July 2024 / Clare Hughes-Williams , Catrin Davies
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Wasted costs applications: on the up!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
181420
Clare Hughes-Williams & Catrin Davies advise lawyers to guard against the rise in wasted costs applications
  • Wasted cost applications are not easy and should only be made in relatively extreme cases where the issues can be disposed of summarily.

As lawyers who represent the profession and their insurers, we have seen an increase in winning parties in litigation using the wasted costs jurisdiction to recover the significant legal costs that are often incurred. Rather than the losing party, it is lawyers who are their target. Recent cases support our experience (Al Tarboush v Yusuf Cassam [2024] EWHC 639 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 121 (Mar) and Rainer Hughes Solicitors v Liverpool Victoria, Emine Karadag and Dzheylyan Velkova Ilieva [2024] EWHC 585 (KB)), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (Mar)). But should it be the lawyers who pay?

The court’s power to award wasted costs is contained in s 51(6) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, and s 51(7) states: ‘“Wasted costs” means any costs incurred by a party:

(a)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll