header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Wasted costs applications: on the up!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 July 2024 / Clare Hughes-Williams , Catrin Davies
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
181420
Clare Hughes-Williams & Catrin Davies advise lawyers to guard against the rise in wasted costs applications
  • Wasted cost applications are not easy and should only be made in relatively extreme cases where the issues can be disposed of summarily.

As lawyers who represent the profession and their insurers, we have seen an increase in winning parties in litigation using the wasted costs jurisdiction to recover the significant legal costs that are often incurred. Rather than the losing party, it is lawyers who are their target. Recent cases support our experience (Al Tarboush v Yusuf Cassam [2024] EWHC 639 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 121 (Mar) and Rainer Hughes Solicitors v Liverpool Victoria, Emine Karadag and Dzheylyan Velkova Ilieva [2024] EWHC 585 (KB)), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (Mar)). But should it be the lawyers who pay?

The court’s power to award wasted costs is contained in s 51(6) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, and s 51(7) states: ‘“Wasted costs” means any costs incurred by a party:

(a)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

National Pro Bono Centre—Esther McConnell & Sarah Oliver Scemla

Charity strengthens leadership as national Pro Bono Week takes place

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Michelman Robinson—Akshay Sewlikar

Dual-qualified partner joins London disputes practice

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

McDermott Will & Schulte—Karen Butler

Transactions practice welcomes partner in London office

NEWS
Read All
Getty v Stability AI: Potential landmark case fizzles out
Intellectual property lawyers have expressed disappointment a ground-breaking claim on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) ended with no precedent being set
Double review on whiplash and fixed costs
Two separate post-implementation reviews are being held into the extension of fixed recoverable costs for personal injury claims and the whiplash regime
CILEx Regulation prepares for post-Mazur rush
Legal executives can apply for standalone litigation practice rights, the Legal Services Board (LSB) has confirmed, in a move likely to offset some of the confusion caused by Mazur
Sir Andrew McFarlane reports on judge shortages
Delays in the family court in London and the south east are partly due to a 20% shortage of judges, Sir Andrew McFarlane, president of the Family Division, has told MPs
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—enter now!
Entries are now open for the 2026 LexisNexis Legal Awards, celebrating achievement and innovation in the law across 24 categories
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll