header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 July 2024 / Clare Hughes-Williams , Catrin Davies
Issue: 8079 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Wasted costs applications: on the up!

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
181420
Clare Hughes-Williams & Catrin Davies advise lawyers to guard against the rise in wasted costs applications
  • Wasted cost applications are not easy and should only be made in relatively extreme cases where the issues can be disposed of summarily.

As lawyers who represent the profession and their insurers, we have seen an increase in winning parties in litigation using the wasted costs jurisdiction to recover the significant legal costs that are often incurred. Rather than the losing party, it is lawyers who are their target. Recent cases support our experience (Al Tarboush v Yusuf Cassam [2024] EWHC 639 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 121 (Mar) and Rainer Hughes Solicitors v Liverpool Victoria, Emine Karadag and Dzheylyan Velkova Ilieva [2024] EWHC 585 (KB)), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (Mar)). But should it be the lawyers who pay?

The court’s power to award wasted costs is contained in s 51(6) of the Supreme Court Act 1981, and s 51(7) states: ‘“Wasted costs” means any costs incurred by a party:

(a)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Company conspiracy clarified
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
NLJ this week: Home is where intent lies
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
NLJ this week: Farewell to Chancery
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
NLJ this week: Silence carries a price
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
NLJ this week: Costs sting after a courtroom gamble
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll