header-logo header-logo

05 July 2018 / Steven Gasztowicz KC
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

One court, one judiciary?

nlj_7800_gasztowicz

Steven Gasztowicz QC considers the radical question of whether there could ever be ‘one civil court’ & ‘one judiciary’

  • Describes moves towards an integrated system of courts and tribunals

In 1988, when I was seven years’ call (heady days!) I sent a paper to Igor Judge QC, as he then was, who was the Leader of my circuit. It was in response to a talk he had given about the way in which the Bar had to adapt to modern times.

In my no doubt rather naïve paper, I suggested some basic parts of the legal system also needed straightening out, and that it was absurd for some cases to have to go to the county court and others to the High Court. I suggested it was even more absurd that, for example, a District Judge (then known as a ‘registrar’) was tied to only deciding particular matters in the county court and anything else had to go to a circuit judge, while the same individual sitting in the same room could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll