header-logo header-logo

One court, one judiciary?

05 July 2018 / Steven Gasztowicz KC
Issue: 7800 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail
nlj_7800_gasztowicz

Steven Gasztowicz QC considers the radical question of whether there could ever be ‘one civil court’ & ‘one judiciary’

  • Describes moves towards an integrated system of courts and tribunals

In 1988, when I was seven years’ call (heady days!) I sent a paper to Igor Judge QC, as he then was, who was the Leader of my circuit. It was in response to a talk he had given about the way in which the Bar had to adapt to modern times.

In my no doubt rather naïve paper, I suggested some basic parts of the legal system also needed straightening out, and that it was absurd for some cases to have to go to the county court and others to the High Court. I suggested it was even more absurd that, for example, a District Judge (then known as a ‘registrar’) was tied to only deciding particular matters in the county court and anything else had to go to a circuit judge, while the same individual sitting in the same room could

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Sonya Sceats, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law

NLJ Career Profile: Sonya Sceats, the British Institute of International and Comparative Law

Sonya Sceats, next director and CEO of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, discusses her long-standing mission to uphold and defend the rule of law

Anthony Collins—four appointments

Anthony Collins—four appointments

Property and commercial teams bolstered by senior hires

Keystone Law—Ben Knowles

Keystone Law—Ben Knowles

International arbitration specialist strenghtens the team

NEWS
Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
back-to-top-scroll