header-logo header-logo

Online opportunities

16 October 2014
Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

UK law firms are not making full use of online marketing, research has found.

More than half of the top 200 do not have a “mobile responsive” website that can be viewed on tablets or mobiles. Yet, each day, about two million online searches are made for legal terms in the UK, more than a third of which are done via mobile or tablet.

The study, by marketing agency mmadigital, found video was under-used on law firm websites. In the top 200 firms, 90% do not use video on their home page.

Mmadigital has created a benchmarking site www.comparemyfirm.co.uk for firms featured in the top 200 to see how they compare with competitors.

Dez Derry, CEO of mmadigital, says: “If your law firm can be accessed from a mobile device and has short videos instead of text, potential clients will be more likely to choose you for their legal work because this is the user experience that they are getting in other parts of their online lives.”

Issue: 7626 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll