header-logo header-logo

An open road?

22 September 2011 / John Eames , David Burrows
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Has the judicial review route from the Upper Tribunal re-opened to traffic, ask David Burrows & John Eames

Two recent cases have given the Supreme Court a relatively early opportunity to review the workings of the new administrative appeals scheme set up under Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007), Pt 1 (which came into operation on 3 November 2008), and of the varied jurisdictions which are covered by the tribunals set up under it (R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal, R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 28, [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Jun), heard alongside Scottish case Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2011] UKSC 29, [2011] All ER (D) 150 (Jun)).

In particular, the judgment in Cart provided an opportunity to look at operation of the appellate Upper Tribunal and the extent to which any decision it makes not to give permission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll