header-logo header-logo

22 September 2011 / John Eames , David Burrows
Issue: 7482 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

An open road?

Has the judicial review route from the Upper Tribunal re-opened to traffic, ask David Burrows & John Eames

Two recent cases have given the Supreme Court a relatively early opportunity to review the workings of the new administrative appeals scheme set up under Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 (TCEA 2007), Pt 1 (which came into operation on 3 November 2008), and of the varied jurisdictions which are covered by the tribunals set up under it (R (on the application of Cart) v The Upper Tribunal, R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 28, [2011] All ER (D) 149 (Jun), heard alongside Scottish case Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [2011] UKSC 29, [2011] All ER (D) 150 (Jun)).

In particular, the judgment in Cart provided an opportunity to look at operation of the appellate Upper Tribunal and the extent to which any decision it makes not to give permission

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll