header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Open sesame

istock_000001465775medium_4

Can information disclosed in family proceedings be released to particular individuals or bodies, asks David Burrows

When may documents or other evidence which arises in family proceedings be released to third parties? Use of documents produced in family proceedings, or of information or other evidence, arising from the proceedings, and their disclosure to third parties raises three particular questions:

  • To what extent may such documents, information or other evidence be publicised generally?
  • Can disclosed documents or other information or evidence be released to particular individuals or bodies, such as HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), the Child Support Agency—even the police—for uses separate from the family proceedings?
  • To what extent is it possible to secure the release to third parties, eg the police, of self-incriminating evidence given by parties to care proceedings under the protection of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 98?

In this article the question arises in connection with the second of the above examples, specifically in relation to financial order (formerly ancillary relief) proceedings, where HMRC wishes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll