header-logo header-logo

13 July 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Open sesame

istock_000001465775medium_4

Can information disclosed in family proceedings be released to particular individuals or bodies, asks David Burrows

When may documents or other evidence which arises in family proceedings be released to third parties? Use of documents produced in family proceedings, or of information or other evidence, arising from the proceedings, and their disclosure to third parties raises three particular questions:

  • To what extent may such documents, information or other evidence be publicised generally?
  • Can disclosed documents or other information or evidence be released to particular individuals or bodies, such as HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), the Child Support Agency—even the police—for uses separate from the family proceedings?
  • To what extent is it possible to secure the release to third parties, eg the police, of self-incriminating evidence given by parties to care proceedings under the protection of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 98?

In this article the question arises in connection with the second of the above examples, specifically in relation to financial order (formerly ancillary relief) proceedings, where HMRC wishes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll