header-logo header-logo

Open sesame

13 July 2012 / David Burrows
Issue: 7522 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail
istock_000001465775medium_4

Can information disclosed in family proceedings be released to particular individuals or bodies, asks David Burrows

When may documents or other evidence which arises in family proceedings be released to third parties? Use of documents produced in family proceedings, or of information or other evidence, arising from the proceedings, and their disclosure to third parties raises three particular questions:

  • To what extent may such documents, information or other evidence be publicised generally?
  • Can disclosed documents or other information or evidence be released to particular individuals or bodies, such as HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), the Child Support Agency—even the police—for uses separate from the family proceedings?
  • To what extent is it possible to secure the release to third parties, eg the police, of self-incriminating evidence given by parties to care proceedings under the protection of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 98?

In this article the question arises in connection with the second of the above examples, specifically in relation to financial order (formerly ancillary relief) proceedings, where HMRC wishes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll