header-logo header-logo

26 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The opposition speaks on Brexit

Pre-General Election, Keir Starmer sets out Labour’s plans for the UK’s exit from the EU

The Labour Party would guarantee EU citizens’ right to stay in the UK following Brexit but has ruled out both membership of the single market and a second referendum.

Outlining plans for Brexit this week, Keir Starmer, shadow Brexit secretary, said Labour would ensure that the European Court of Justice continues to play a role in the UK legal system and that Labour would continue to implement EU labour laws and environmental standards post-Brexit. However, he also said Labour would not accept the current rules on free movement of people, which means it could not be a member of the single market unless the single market is reformed.

Starmer said Labour would replace the proposed Great Repeal Bill with an EU Rights and Protections Bill to ‘make sure that all EU-derived laws—including workplace laws, consumer rights and environmental protections—are fully protected without qualifications, limitations or sunset clauses’. He continued: ‘A Labour government will work with EU partners, trade unions and businesses to ensure that, outside the EU, the UK does not lag behind Europe in workplace protections or environmental standards in future.’ He also pledged to replace the government’s Brexit White Paper with a new one confirming that jobs and the economy are the government’s priority throughout.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said her government will prioritise regaining control of immigration.

Starmer said powers being returned to the UK that relate to devolved matters, notably agriculture, would be given to the devolved administrations. He said Labour would consider keeping Britain in the customs union. Labour also want to maintain membership with bodies such as Eurojust, Europol and the European Medicines Agency, he said.

Theresa May described Labour’s Brexit plans as ‘nonsensical’. Speaking ahead of Starmer’s speech, Liberal Democrat Leader Tim Farron said Labour’s Brexit policy had ‘more holes than a colander’.

Meanwhile, commentators say the 8 June General Election will benefit the Brexit process.

Oliver Ilott, senior researcher at the think tank Institute for government, said the election would clarify the prime minister’s mandate, clearly demarking what they can and cannot agree, thus limiting their ability to make concessions and strengthening their bargaining power. Ilott said pushing the next election back to 2022 rather than 2020 would give the government the flexibility for a three-year transition period.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll