header-logo header-logo

26 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The opposition speaks on Brexit

Pre-General Election, Keir Starmer sets out Labour’s plans for the UK’s exit from the EU

The Labour Party would guarantee EU citizens’ right to stay in the UK following Brexit but has ruled out both membership of the single market and a second referendum.

Outlining plans for Brexit this week, Keir Starmer, shadow Brexit secretary, said Labour would ensure that the European Court of Justice continues to play a role in the UK legal system and that Labour would continue to implement EU labour laws and environmental standards post-Brexit. However, he also said Labour would not accept the current rules on free movement of people, which means it could not be a member of the single market unless the single market is reformed.

Starmer said Labour would replace the proposed Great Repeal Bill with an EU Rights and Protections Bill to ‘make sure that all EU-derived laws—including workplace laws, consumer rights and environmental protections—are fully protected without qualifications, limitations or sunset clauses’. He continued: ‘A Labour government will work with EU partners, trade unions and businesses to ensure that, outside the EU, the UK does not lag behind Europe in workplace protections or environmental standards in future.’ He also pledged to replace the government’s Brexit White Paper with a new one confirming that jobs and the economy are the government’s priority throughout.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said her government will prioritise regaining control of immigration.

Starmer said powers being returned to the UK that relate to devolved matters, notably agriculture, would be given to the devolved administrations. He said Labour would consider keeping Britain in the customs union. Labour also want to maintain membership with bodies such as Eurojust, Europol and the European Medicines Agency, he said.

Theresa May described Labour’s Brexit plans as ‘nonsensical’. Speaking ahead of Starmer’s speech, Liberal Democrat Leader Tim Farron said Labour’s Brexit policy had ‘more holes than a colander’.

Meanwhile, commentators say the 8 June General Election will benefit the Brexit process.

Oliver Ilott, senior researcher at the think tank Institute for government, said the election would clarify the prime minister’s mandate, clearly demarking what they can and cannot agree, thus limiting their ability to make concessions and strengthening their bargaining power. Ilott said pushing the next election back to 2022 rather than 2020 would give the government the flexibility for a three-year transition period.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll