header-logo header-logo

The opposition speaks on Brexit

26 April 2017
Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Pre-General Election, Keir Starmer sets out Labour’s plans for the UK’s exit from the EU

The Labour Party would guarantee EU citizens’ right to stay in the UK following Brexit but has ruled out both membership of the single market and a second referendum.

Outlining plans for Brexit this week, Keir Starmer, shadow Brexit secretary, said Labour would ensure that the European Court of Justice continues to play a role in the UK legal system and that Labour would continue to implement EU labour laws and environmental standards post-Brexit. However, he also said Labour would not accept the current rules on free movement of people, which means it could not be a member of the single market unless the single market is reformed.

Starmer said Labour would replace the proposed Great Repeal Bill with an EU Rights and Protections Bill to ‘make sure that all EU-derived laws—including workplace laws, consumer rights and environmental protections—are fully protected without qualifications, limitations or sunset clauses’. He continued: ‘A Labour government will work with EU partners, trade unions and businesses to ensure that, outside the EU, the UK does not lag behind Europe in workplace protections or environmental standards in future.’ He also pledged to replace the government’s Brexit White Paper with a new one confirming that jobs and the economy are the government’s priority throughout.

Prime Minister Theresa May has said her government will prioritise regaining control of immigration.

Starmer said powers being returned to the UK that relate to devolved matters, notably agriculture, would be given to the devolved administrations. He said Labour would consider keeping Britain in the customs union. Labour also want to maintain membership with bodies such as Eurojust, Europol and the European Medicines Agency, he said.

Theresa May described Labour’s Brexit plans as ‘nonsensical’. Speaking ahead of Starmer’s speech, Liberal Democrat Leader Tim Farron said Labour’s Brexit policy had ‘more holes than a colander’.

Meanwhile, commentators say the 8 June General Election will benefit the Brexit process.

Oliver Ilott, senior researcher at the think tank Institute for government, said the election would clarify the prime minister’s mandate, clearly demarking what they can and cannot agree, thus limiting their ability to make concessions and strengthening their bargaining power. Ilott said pushing the next election back to 2022 rather than 2020 would give the government the flexibility for a three-year transition period.

Issue: 7743 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll