header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Opt-out action allowed to proceed by High Court

The High Court has rejected a bid to strike out a claim brought on an opt-out basis by a representative against a firm of intellectual property lawyers.

Handing down judgment in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP [2023] EWHC 398 (Comm) last week, Mr Justice Robin Knowles held the claimant had met the threshold for representative claimants set out by the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google [2021] UKSC 50.

Non-practising solicitor Peter Rouse is the sole director of the claimant company, which alleges Marks & Clerk earned tens of millions of pounds in undisclosed commissions, and seeks the recovery of these.

However, Marks & Clerk and Clarivate (formerly CPA Global, which the claimant alleges paid the commissions) deny any wrongdoing.

Daniel Spendlove, partner at Signature Litigation, representing the claimant, said the judgment was ‘significant for the legal industry, providing greater clarity on the limits of England and Wales’ representative action regime.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll