header-logo header-logo

Opt-out action allowed to proceed by High Court

01 March 2023
Issue: 8015 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
The High Court has rejected a bid to strike out a claim brought on an opt-out basis by a representative against a firm of intellectual property lawyers.

Handing down judgment in Commission Recovery Ltd v Marks & Clerk LLP [2023] EWHC 398 (Comm) last week, Mr Justice Robin Knowles held the claimant had met the threshold for representative claimants set out by the Supreme Court in Lloyd v Google [2021] UKSC 50.

Non-practising solicitor Peter Rouse is the sole director of the claimant company, which alleges Marks & Clerk earned tens of millions of pounds in undisclosed commissions, and seeks the recovery of these.

However, Marks & Clerk and Clarivate (formerly CPA Global, which the claimant alleges paid the commissions) deny any wrongdoing.

Daniel Spendlove, partner at Signature Litigation, representing the claimant, said the judgment was ‘significant for the legal industry, providing greater clarity on the limits of England and Wales’ representative action regime.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll