header-logo header-logo

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

Order to release secret ID card reports quashed

News

An information tribunal ruling which ordered the release of independent reviews of the government’s identity card scheme has been quashed by the High Court.

Mr Justice Stanley Burnton said the tribunal had erred in the way it had come to its decision and ruled that the Freedom of Information (FOI) case must now be reassessed by a new tribunal.

Independent reviews of progress of the controversial ID card scheme—Gateway Reviews —are periodically produced by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and an activist and a MP used the FOI Act 2000 to request publication of two of these.

The High Court said the tribunal’s decision could not stand because it had been partly based on a report on the confidentiality of the Gateway Reviews produced by a Parliamentary Select Committee. This, said Stanley Burnton J, risked breaching the ancient right of Parliamentary privilege.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollitts, says the Information Commission and the tribunal will have to take greater care to ensure the reasoning behind their decisions and the methods by which they arrive at their decisions are sound. “Failure to do so could lead to a greater number of decisions being challenged,” he adds.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll