header-logo header-logo

Order to release secret ID card reports quashed

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

News

An information tribunal ruling which ordered the release of independent reviews of the government’s identity card scheme has been quashed by the High Court.

Mr Justice Stanley Burnton said the tribunal had erred in the way it had come to its decision and ruled that the Freedom of Information (FOI) case must now be reassessed by a new tribunal.

Independent reviews of progress of the controversial ID card scheme—Gateway Reviews —are periodically produced by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and an activist and a MP used the FOI Act 2000 to request publication of two of these.

The High Court said the tribunal’s decision could not stand because it had been partly based on a report on the confidentiality of the Gateway Reviews produced by a Parliamentary Select Committee. This, said Stanley Burnton J, risked breaching the ancient right of Parliamentary privilege.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollitts, says the Information Commission and the tribunal will have to take greater care to ensure the reasoning behind their decisions and the methods by which they arrive at their decisions are sound. “Failure to do so could lead to a greater number of decisions being challenged,” he adds.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll