header-logo header-logo

Order to release secret ID card reports quashed

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

News

An information tribunal ruling which ordered the release of independent reviews of the government’s identity card scheme has been quashed by the High Court.

Mr Justice Stanley Burnton said the tribunal had erred in the way it had come to its decision and ruled that the Freedom of Information (FOI) case must now be reassessed by a new tribunal.

Independent reviews of progress of the controversial ID card scheme—Gateway Reviews —are periodically produced by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and an activist and a MP used the FOI Act 2000 to request publication of two of these.

The High Court said the tribunal’s decision could not stand because it had been partly based on a report on the confidentiality of the Gateway Reviews produced by a Parliamentary Select Committee. This, said Stanley Burnton J, risked breaching the ancient right of Parliamentary privilege.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollitts, says the Information Commission and the tribunal will have to take greater care to ensure the reasoning behind their decisions and the methods by which they arrive at their decisions are sound. “Failure to do so could lead to a greater number of decisions being challenged,” he adds.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll