header-logo header-logo

Order to release secret ID card reports quashed

24 April 2008
Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-detail

News

An information tribunal ruling which ordered the release of independent reviews of the government’s identity card scheme has been quashed by the High Court.

Mr Justice Stanley Burnton said the tribunal had erred in the way it had come to its decision and ruled that the Freedom of Information (FOI) case must now be reassessed by a new tribunal.

Independent reviews of progress of the controversial ID card scheme—Gateway Reviews —are periodically produced by the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) and an activist and a MP used the FOI Act 2000 to request publication of two of these.

The High Court said the tribunal’s decision could not stand because it had been partly based on a report on the confidentiality of the Gateway Reviews produced by a Parliamentary Select Committee. This, said Stanley Burnton J, risked breaching the ancient right of Parliamentary privilege.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollitts, says the Information Commission and the tribunal will have to take greater care to ensure the reasoning behind their decisions and the methods by which they arrive at their decisions are sound. “Failure to do so could lead to a greater number of decisions being challenged,” he adds.

Issue: 7318 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Community care
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll