header-logo header-logo

Out of date?

07 February 2014 / Murray Heining
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_heining_0

Is the Solicitors Act 1974 still relevant, asks Murray Heining

Since the introduction of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) and the extension to persons authorised to provide legal services, I have mulled over the continued relevance of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974).

Bentine

The recent ruling in Bentine v Bentine [2013] EWHC 3098 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 02 (Nov) brought it to mind again. Proudman J had to determine whether costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded from the total of invoiced costs for the purposes of the “one-fifth rule” contained in s 70(9) of SA 1974.

This provides that if a solicitor’s bill is reduced by one fifth or more, then the solicitor will bear the costs of the assessment. If the bill is reduced by less than one-fifth or is not reduced, then they are paid by the paying party, unless there are good reasons found to depart from this rule. She ruled that costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded for the “one-fifth”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll