header-logo header-logo

Out of date?

07 February 2014 / Murray Heining
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
web_heining_0

Is the Solicitors Act 1974 still relevant, asks Murray Heining

Since the introduction of the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) and the extension to persons authorised to provide legal services, I have mulled over the continued relevance of the Solicitors Act 1974 (SA 1974).

Bentine

The recent ruling in Bentine v Bentine [2013] EWHC 3098 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 02 (Nov) brought it to mind again. Proudman J had to determine whether costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded from the total of invoiced costs for the purposes of the “one-fifth rule” contained in s 70(9) of SA 1974.

This provides that if a solicitor’s bill is reduced by one fifth or more, then the solicitor will bear the costs of the assessment. If the bill is reduced by less than one-fifth or is not reduced, then they are paid by the paying party, unless there are good reasons found to depart from this rule. She ruled that costs disallowed for want of retainer should be excluded for the “one-fifth”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll