header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Clare Copeman
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Outside help

The upside of external funding is clear, but firms should watch out for pitfalls says Clare Copeman

By the end of 2006, over 50% of the top 100 UK law firms had registered as limited liability partnerships with Companies House, which represents a significant development within the sector. However, the Legal Services Bill paves the way for further change, as it will allow firms to be licensed as alternative business structures (ABSs) with external (non-lawyer) shareholders or stakeholders.

A survey of 88 of the top 125 law firms, published by Smith & Williamson earlier this year shows that over half of those questioned expect to see firms seeking external funding, through private equity and public listing. The potential upside of external funding is clear to see…but firms must beware the possible pitfalls.

Tax and LLPs

The traditional partnership model has tended to suit law firms well, as they are generally people businesses with relatively low capital requirements. There has therefore been no great need to accumulate capital within the business—which can be done more tax-efficiently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll