header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Clare Copeman
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Outside help

The upside of external funding is clear, but firms should watch out for pitfalls says Clare Copeman

By the end of 2006, over 50% of the top 100 UK law firms had registered as limited liability partnerships with Companies House, which represents a significant development within the sector. However, the Legal Services Bill paves the way for further change, as it will allow firms to be licensed as alternative business structures (ABSs) with external (non-lawyer) shareholders or stakeholders.

A survey of 88 of the top 125 law firms, published by Smith & Williamson earlier this year shows that over half of those questioned expect to see firms seeking external funding, through private equity and public listing. The potential upside of external funding is clear to see…but firms must beware the possible pitfalls.

Tax and LLPs

The traditional partnership model has tended to suit law firms well, as they are generally people businesses with relatively low capital requirements. There has therefore been no great need to accumulate capital within the business—which can be done more tax-efficiently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll