header-logo header-logo

22 February 2007 / Clare Copeman
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Outside help

The upside of external funding is clear, but firms should watch out for pitfalls says Clare Copeman

By the end of 2006, over 50% of the top 100 UK law firms had registered as limited liability partnerships with Companies House, which represents a significant development within the sector. However, the Legal Services Bill paves the way for further change, as it will allow firms to be licensed as alternative business structures (ABSs) with external (non-lawyer) shareholders or stakeholders.

A survey of 88 of the top 125 law firms, published by Smith & Williamson earlier this year shows that over half of those questioned expect to see firms seeking external funding, through private equity and public listing. The potential upside of external funding is clear to see…but firms must beware the possible pitfalls.

Tax and LLPs

The traditional partnership model has tended to suit law firms well, as they are generally people businesses with relatively low capital requirements. There has therefore been no great need to accumulate capital within the business—which can be done more tax-efficiently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll