header-logo header-logo

Insurance transfers: over to you?

31 March 2021 / Anthony de Garr Robinson KC
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
Anthony de Garr Robinson QC discusses the principles governing the transfer of insurance business to other insurers
  • Re Prudential Assurance Co Ltd: recasting of the principles to be applied on an application for sanctioning an insurance transfer under Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.

The insurance business transfer regime under Part VII of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 plays an important role in the UK insurance industry. It is widely regarded as providing a stable mechanism by which UK insurers can transfer portfolios of insurance contracts to other insurers. Established in a long line of first instance cases starting with Re London Life Association Ltd [1989] Lexis Citation 1731, the principles applied by the courts in determining whether to sanction a transfer have been seen as clear (albeit increasingly elaborate). This has allowed insurers to be confident about when they can safely invoke this expensive process.

This was thrown into doubt by the decision of Snowden J in Re Prudential Assurance

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll