header-logo header-logo

05 May 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Paper chase

nlj_7744_dobson

Cohabitant pension rights have been strengthened by the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the requirement for nomination, explains Nicholas Dobson

  • Requiring a pension scheme member to nominate an informal domestic partner as a condition of her receiving a survivor’s benefit on the death of the pensioner breached Art 14 when read with A1P1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In 2015 American singer/songwriter, Angel Easterling told us: ‘I’m a common law wife, living out my life/I ain’t got no license, I’m a common law wife.’ However, in English law the term has social rather than legal significance. And while Robert Lloyd (the 18th century poet and satirist) once told Lord Chief Justice Mansfield that he was born to ‘strip chicanery of its vain pretence’ and ‘marry Common Law to Common Sense’, in England the legal rights of informal domestic cohabitants remain uncertain and highly context specific.

But (in what The Guardian described as a ‘significant extension of unmarried cohabitees’ rights’ which ‘could affect millions of families’), on 8 February 2017

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll