header-logo header-logo

Paper chase

05 May 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7744 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7744_dobson

Cohabitant pension rights have been strengthened by the recent decision of the Supreme Court on the requirement for nomination, explains Nicholas Dobson

  • Requiring a pension scheme member to nominate an informal domestic partner as a condition of her receiving a survivor’s benefit on the death of the pensioner breached Art 14 when read with A1P1 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

In 2015 American singer/songwriter, Angel Easterling told us: ‘I’m a common law wife, living out my life/I ain’t got no license, I’m a common law wife.’ However, in English law the term has social rather than legal significance. And while Robert Lloyd (the 18th century poet and satirist) once told Lord Chief Justice Mansfield that he was born to ‘strip chicanery of its vain pretence’ and ‘marry Common Law to Common Sense’, in England the legal rights of informal domestic cohabitants remain uncertain and highly context specific.

But (in what The Guardian described as a ‘significant extension of unmarried cohabitees’ rights’ which ‘could affect millions of families’), on 8 February 2017

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll