header-logo header-logo

Parting shots

24 March 2011 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Robert Hines explores the thorny issue of pre-marital agreements & a foreign national’s right to apply for financial relief

The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Traversa v Freddi [2011] All ER (D) 289 (Feb) EWCA Civ 81, and, in doing so, granted an Italian waiter, whose wife had obtained a separation order and divorce in Italy, permission to apply for financial relief in the courts of England and Wales under Part III of the Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1984 (Part III).

Facts

The parties, Traversa (the husband) and Freddi (the wife), are Italian nationals who were married in Italy on 14 November 1987. The wife was from an affluent family based in Northern Italy, whereas the husband came from a modest background in the Calabrian region of Southern Italy.
Before the marriage, the parties agreed to enter into a pre-marital agreement in which they elected for separation of goods regime should the marriage breakdown. 

Following the marriage, the parties divided their time between Italy and England where they invested in a number

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll