header-logo header-logo

Parting shots

24 March 2011 / Robert Hines
Issue: 7458 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Robert Hines explores the thorny issue of pre-marital agreements & a foreign national’s right to apply for financial relief

The Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the case of Traversa v Freddi [2011] All ER (D) 289 (Feb) EWCA Civ 81, and, in doing so, granted an Italian waiter, whose wife had obtained a separation order and divorce in Italy, permission to apply for financial relief in the courts of England and Wales under Part III of the Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1984 (Part III).

Facts

The parties, Traversa (the husband) and Freddi (the wife), are Italian nationals who were married in Italy on 14 November 1987. The wife was from an affluent family based in Northern Italy, whereas the husband came from a modest background in the Calabrian region of Southern Italy.
Before the marriage, the parties agreed to enter into a pre-marital agreement in which they elected for separation of goods regime should the marriage breakdown. 

Following the marriage, the parties divided their time between Italy and England where they invested in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll