header-logo header-logo

30 October 2026
Issue: 8183 / Categories: Features , Technology , Legal services
printer mail-detail

*Partner copy* From Adobe to Automation

262538
How Reeds Solicitors Rethought Court Bundling

For years, creating court bundles at Reeds Solicitors relied heavily on Adobe Acrobat Pro and a significant amount of manual effort. While the process worked, it was time-consuming, labour-intensive and increasingly out of step with the firm’s desire for greater efficiency.

As a national law firm specialising in personal and business law, Reeds wanted more than a PDF creation tool. The team sought a solution that could streamline bundle preparation, deliver better value and integrate with its existing technology.

After evaluating three leading bundling providers, Reeds selected Zylpha, a cloud-based platform designed specifically for legal professionals.

The move has transformed the firm’s approach to bundle preparation. Tasks such as document conversion, pagination and index creation are now largely automated, helping staff work more efficiently while reducing the risk of human error.

Perhaps most significantly, team adoption has been extremely positive.

“One of the biggest benefits has been how quickly staff have adapted to the platform,” said Judy Matthews, Practice Manager at Reeds Solicitors. “People who previously avoided bundling are now confident using the system, which has made a real difference to the way we work.”

Zylpha combines automated court bundling, secure file sharing and integrated PDF editing tools within a single platform designed for legal teams of all sizes.

Tim Long, CEO of Zylpha, said:

“Our goal has always been to make court bundling simpler, faster and more reliable for legal professionals. Feedback like this demonstrates how purpose-built technology can help firms modernise processes that have traditionally consumed significant amounts of valuable time.”

To learn more about the decision and experience, we spoke with Reeds Solicitors.

Q: Why did Reeds Solicitors start looking for an alternative to Adobe Acrobat Pro?

“While Adobe could produce bundles, it wasn’t providing the efficiency or workflow improvements we were looking for. We wanted a solution specifically designed for legal bundling that would reduce manual administration, offer better value for money and provide opportunities for integration with our existing systems.”

Q: How did Zylpha stand out against the other providers you evaluated?

“We reviewed three different providers during the selection process. Zylpha was the only solution that met all our key requirements: usability, value for money and integration potential. It offered a strong balance of functionality without adding unnecessary complexity.”

Q: What has the day-to-day impact been on the team?

“The impact has been overwhelmingly positive. Team members who previously viewed bundling as a cumbersome task are now far more confident and willing to undertake the work. By automating processes such as file conversion, pagination and index generation, the platform removes many of the repetitive administrative tasks that previously consumed valuable time.

“Just as importantly, it has helped create a more consistent approach to bundle preparation across the firm.”

Q: Beyond ease of use, what functionality does the platform provide?

“The platform includes a comprehensive set of tools designed specifically for legal document preparation. Being able to amend a PDF using the inbuilt editor and then save it back into our system is just one way that Zylpha adds value above their bundling functionality.

“Having these functions available within a single platform helps simplify bundle creation while reducing the need for multiple separate applications.”

Q: Was integration with Bedrock part of the decision-making process?

“Yes. We wanted a bundling solution that could work alongside Bedrock, our cloud-based case management system, rather than operating as an entirely separate process. Having technology that complements existing workflows was an important consideration when assessing potential providers.”

Q: What lessons can other law firms take from your experience?

“Our experience demonstrates that specialist legal technology can deliver significant advantages over general-purpose document software when dealing with highly specific legal processes.

“Court bundling requires adherence to strict procedural requirements, and purpose-built solutions are better positioned to automate routine tasks, improve consistency and reduce administrative burden. Many firms may not realise how much inefficiency exists in their current processes until they adopt software designed specifically for the role.”

Q: Why do you think this partnership has been successful?

“The success comes from aligning the technology with the practical needs of legal professionals. The platform focuses on solving real-world challenges associated with court bundling, helping teams create bundles more efficiently while maintaining the standards required by the courts.

“For us, that combination of efficiency, reliability and ease of adoption has made the difference.”


Reeds Solicitors is a national law firm specialising in personal and business law. Zylpha’s Online Court Bundling platform helps legal teams streamline the creation of court-ready bundles. With a free entry-level plan available, firms can explore the platform and its benefits without financial commitment. Get started today at www.zylpha.com

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll