header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Past hurt can’t diminish the hope

nlj_7799_hynes-

What can legal aid practitioners & users learn from the World Cup? Steve Hynes plays a blinder

A few days before the start of the World Cup academics and researchers gathered for a conference on Access to Justice and Legal Services at University College London (UCL). The conference was run by the UCL Centre for Empirical Legal Studies and was attended by delegates from a range of countries as diverse as the other event which was about to kick off in Moscow. Instead of the excitement and frustration of the beautiful game though, delegates were treated to a succession of papers from researchers intended to stimulate thinking on access to justice policy.

Rather like in football the UK had always considered itself a world power in legal aid services. This perceived ascendancy has outlasted the sporting one which died a death (or should have done!) when Poland forced a draw at Wembley in 1973 shutting England out of the 1974 finals. For many years international conferences on legal aid were dominated by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll