header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Past hurt can’t diminish the hope

nlj_7799_hynes-

What can legal aid practitioners & users learn from the World Cup? Steve Hynes plays a blinder

A few days before the start of the World Cup academics and researchers gathered for a conference on Access to Justice and Legal Services at University College London (UCL). The conference was run by the UCL Centre for Empirical Legal Studies and was attended by delegates from a range of countries as diverse as the other event which was about to kick off in Moscow. Instead of the excitement and frustration of the beautiful game though, delegates were treated to a succession of papers from researchers intended to stimulate thinking on access to justice policy.

Rather like in football the UK had always considered itself a world power in legal aid services. This perceived ascendancy has outlasted the sporting one which died a death (or should have done!) when Poland forced a draw at Wembley in 1973 shutting England out of the 1974 finals. For many years international conferences on legal aid were dominated by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll