header-logo header-logo

31 July 2008
Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Patently Plausible

In brief

A patent specification need not show that the invention actually works, but must disclose enough to make the invention plausible, the House of Lords has ruled. In Conor Medsystems Inc v Angiotech Pharmaceuticals Incorporated the law lords considered the question of whether a claimed invention has an “inventive step”. The High Court and the Court of Appeal had found that the patent in this case lacked inventive step because the specification did not solve the problem underlying the claimed invention. However, the law lords ruled that courts should look to the patent claims and not the specification to identify the inventive step and determine obviousness.

Issue: 7332 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll