header-logo header-logo

12 June 2008
Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Payment protection insurance market faces overhaul

Legal news update

A major crackdown on companies selling payment protection insurance (PPI) has been proposed following a damning provisional report by the Competition Commission (CC)—which says customer overcharging could be hitting more than £1.4bn a year.

The possible remedies put forward by the CC include banning the sale of PPI at the credit point of sale, prohibiting the sale of single premium policies, the imposition of price caps and the publication of claims ratios.

Both the findings and the remedies are provisional and do not represent the CC’s final decision. However, says, Wragge & Co partner, Simon Taylor, they present a clear statement of intent and a stern warning for the PPI industry.

“There is much still to play for but the PPI providers will now be on the defensive,” he says.

Most of the UK’s 14m+ PPI policies are sold as a consumer takes out a loan or other type of credit, the report says, with many consumers unaware they can buy PPI from other providers. This makes it difficult for other providers to reach these customers and in the absence of such competitive pressure, the distributors—such as banks, mortgage providers and credit card providers—can charge higher prices.

CC deputy chairman, Peter Davis, says: “We’ve found serious problems with the PPI market and customers are paying for the lack of competition.

“The way PPI is sold as an ‘add-on’ to a loan or other credit product means distributors escape the pressure they should face from competing suppliers.

“Distributors don’t appear to compete much with each other on either price or quality of PPI; neither do they appear to do much direct advertising of PPI to win customers from each other. “

Taylor says there must be real concerns that some of the more draconian remedies envisaged could severely undermine the albeit imperfect market.

“Price caps for example will clearly reduce further the possibility of market entry and hinder market expansion. Removal of the point of sale advantage could result in a dramatic reduction in sales—given that, as the CC notes, it is the only effective way of selling PPI. This will not only presumably leave consumers unprotected but also may result in price increases of the underlying credit products.”

There is also concern, he says, that there may be rebalancing of tariffs to pay for any price reductions in PPI.

“Clearly, a detailed analysis of the extent to which PPI margins are cross-subsidising other product lines—possibly including personal banking—may be appropriate before price caps are introduced,” Taylor adds.

Whatever the outcome, he adds, the banking and credit product industry, already rocked by successive Office of Fair Trading investigations, will continue to endure a bumpy ride over PPI.
 

Issue: 7325 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll