header-logo header-logo

Pensions

17 January 2014
Issue: 7590 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Sarjeant and others v Rigid Group Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1714, [2013] All ER (D) 234 (Dec)

It was an established principle that the rules of a pension scheme had to be construed in a purposive way in the sense of being given a meaning which respected the context in which the relevant rule had been drafted and the purpose it had been intended to achieve. There were no special rules of construction different from those which the courts routinely applied to all contractual documents. However, a pension scheme should be construed so to give a reasonable and practical effect to the scheme. The administration of a pension scheme fund was a complex matter and it seemed that it would be crying for the moon to expect the draftsman to have legislated exhaustively for every eventuality. It was necessary, therefore, to test competing permissible constructions of a pension scheme against the consequences they produced in practice. Technicality was to be avoided. If the consequences were impractical or over-restrictive or technical in practice, that was an indication that some other interpretation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll