header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Thomas Braithwaite
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

The personal touch

nlj_7659_braithwaite

Thomas Braithwaite follows the use of personal claims in support of proprietary rights

The consequence of failing to protect property rights at the Land Registry is, of course, well known. In the language of s 29(1) of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002): “Completion of the disposition by registration has the effect of postponing to the interest under the disposition any interest affecting the estate immediately before the disposition whose priority is not protected at the time of registration.”

The practical consequence of this provision is that following a transfer of land registrable but unregistered property rights cannot be asserted against the new landowner; and, in the absence of title to the land over which they were granted, the rights may be worthless or unenforceable against the former landowner who originally granted them.

Mistakes happen

So far, so obvious. But mistakes happen. Rights that could and should have been registered are sometimes overlooked. And where there are mistakes, there are often those who would seek take advantage of them. A purchaser of land may

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll