header-logo header-logo

Pfizer fined for excessive prices

14 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pharmaceutical company Pfizer has been fined a record £84.2m for charging excessive and unfair prices in the UK for an anti-epilepsy drug.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) also fined the distributor Flynn Pharma £5.2m, after finding that each company broke competition law for the drug, phenytoin sodium. The CMA has ordered the companies to reduce their prices.

In September 2012, the price increased by 2,600% overnight, when the company de-branded (or genericised) the product. This meant the NHS was charged £67.50 rather than £2.83 for 100mg packs of the drug, before the price decreased to £54 in May, 2014. Some 48,000 patients in the UK use the drug to control seizures, and cannot easily switch to another medicine.

The CMA found that both companies held a dominant market position, and that each abused that position.

Philip Marsden, chairman of the case decision group for the CMA’s investigation, said: “This is the highest fine the CMA has imposed and it sends out a clear message to the sector that we are determined to crack down on such behaviour and to protect customers, including the NHS, and taxpayers from being exploited.”

Gustaf Duhs, head of competition and regulatory at Stevens & Bolton, said: “It is very rare for competition regulators to take action in respect of excessive prices because it is very hard to define when a price becomes excessive, and because in a competitive market excessive prices are unsustainable (an increase in price will lead to a loss in market share).” 

Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll