header-logo header-logo

Pfizer fined for excessive prices

14 December 2016
Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Pharmaceutical company Pfizer has been fined a record £84.2m for charging excessive and unfair prices in the UK for an anti-epilepsy drug.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) also fined the distributor Flynn Pharma £5.2m, after finding that each company broke competition law for the drug, phenytoin sodium. The CMA has ordered the companies to reduce their prices.

In September 2012, the price increased by 2,600% overnight, when the company de-branded (or genericised) the product. This meant the NHS was charged £67.50 rather than £2.83 for 100mg packs of the drug, before the price decreased to £54 in May, 2014. Some 48,000 patients in the UK use the drug to control seizures, and cannot easily switch to another medicine.

The CMA found that both companies held a dominant market position, and that each abused that position.

Philip Marsden, chairman of the case decision group for the CMA’s investigation, said: “This is the highest fine the CMA has imposed and it sends out a clear message to the sector that we are determined to crack down on such behaviour and to protect customers, including the NHS, and taxpayers from being exploited.”

Gustaf Duhs, head of competition and regulatory at Stevens & Bolton, said: “It is very rare for competition regulators to take action in respect of excessive prices because it is very hard to define when a price becomes excessive, and because in a competitive market excessive prices are unsustainable (an increase in price will lead to a loss in market share).” 

Issue: 7727 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll