header-logo header-logo

PI: the Jackson aftershock

16 April 2010
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Edited extracts from the live NLJ personal injury newscast first broadcast on 9 April

"One of the themes that runs through Jackson LJ’s final report is the idea that PI claims generally are straightforward and not complex.

Complex issues

In my experience straightforward claims do not carry very much risk, but a lot of complex issues can arise such as forseeability, duty of care, causation etc. Under the current regime, solicitors and counsel take on complex claims putting all their resources and time and effort into them on the grounds that they win some and lose some. That is litigation risk and success fees balance that risk. I feel the report fails to reflect this.

Fundamental principles

There is also the fundamental principle that a victim should recover damages as a result of another person’s negligence. As a principle, the idea that a victim should have to pay some of the costs out of the damages to establish liability in order to obtain damages, I just find unjust. It will also involve undertaking a completely different form of risk assessment. When you can balance that risk with success fees the system works;  but when you have high overheads and disbursements (including counsel’s fees) you may be more reluctant to take on certain cases, without the benefit of success fees. I also feel Sir Rupert has failed to consider the extents to which well established, and excellent, high street solicitors, who are specialist PI practitioners, are going to be affected by the reforms. They will not be in a position to spread these overheads across departments like larger city firms.

Passionate professionals

But whatever happens post the election, solicitors and counsel—those who practise in PI litigation—are passionate about assisting clients and they will continue to provide a first class service. I am confident they will continue acting for clients, and adapt to these changes with confidence.”

Simon Butler, barrister, Ely Place Chambers.  NLJ newscast participant

Issue: 7413 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll