header-logo header-logo

11 September 2015 / Frank Maher
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

PII: A call to arms! (Take 2)

nlj_7667_maher

Frank Maher issues a final warning for solicitors to respond to the SRA discussion paper on PII cover

Most solicitors’ firms are in the process of renewing their professional indemnity insurance for 1 October 2015. But another deadline looms large on the horizon—the closing date for responses to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Discussion paper, Protecting client’s financial interests. Ignore it at your peril—16 September is the last chance to make your views known, and firms of all sizes have every reason to respond: if all the changes under discussion were implemented, we would be moving from a world where virtually all claims are covered to one where few have the broad protection of the SRA minimum terms and conditions (MTC).

Where are we up to?

First, however, where are we up to with the renewal? It may be the last on the current MTC (a point to bear in mind for those thinking of retirement and triggering run-off before its scope is dramatically reduced).

The writer’s recent series

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll