header-logo header-logo

11 September 2015 / Frank Maher
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

PII: A call to arms! (Take 2)

nlj_7667_maher

Frank Maher issues a final warning for solicitors to respond to the SRA discussion paper on PII cover

Most solicitors’ firms are in the process of renewing their professional indemnity insurance for 1 October 2015. But another deadline looms large on the horizon—the closing date for responses to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Discussion paper, Protecting client’s financial interests. Ignore it at your peril—16 September is the last chance to make your views known, and firms of all sizes have every reason to respond: if all the changes under discussion were implemented, we would be moving from a world where virtually all claims are covered to one where few have the broad protection of the SRA minimum terms and conditions (MTC).

Where are we up to?

First, however, where are we up to with the renewal? It may be the last on the current MTC (a point to bear in mind for those thinking of retirement and triggering run-off before its scope is dramatically reduced).

The writer’s recent series

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll