header-logo header-logo

26 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Planning

R (on the application of Hayes) v City of York Council [2017] EWHC 1374 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 53 (Jun)

The Planning Court dismissed the claimant’s application for judicial review of the defendant local planning authority’s grant of planning permission for new features at the historic Clifford’s Tower.

In the first case raising directly the meaning and effect of para 141 of the National Planning Policy Framework, it held that the last sentence of that paragraph only made good sense if interpreted so that the words the ability to recover evidence ‘should not be a factor’ in deciding were taken mean ‘should not be a decisive factor’ in deciding whether the harm to the asset should be permitted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen—five promotions

Carey Olsen promotes five lawyers to the partnership

NEWS
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
Material obtained through US discovery applications may have a much longer legal life than many litigants realise
English courts are developing a distinctly practical approach to sanctions disputes arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine
back-to-top-scroll