header-logo header-logo

26 June 2017
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Planning

R (on the application of Hayes) v City of York Council [2017] EWHC 1374 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 53 (Jun)

The Planning Court dismissed the claimant’s application for judicial review of the defendant local planning authority’s grant of planning permission for new features at the historic Clifford’s Tower.

In the first case raising directly the meaning and effect of para 141 of the National Planning Policy Framework, it held that the last sentence of that paragraph only made good sense if interpreted so that the words the ability to recover evidence ‘should not be a factor’ in deciding were taken mean ‘should not be a decisive factor’ in deciding whether the harm to the asset should be permitted.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft—Kirstie Pike & Simy Khanna

DAC Beachcroft further builds national Professional Liability practice, hiring two partners in Bristol

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll