header-logo header-logo

Playing by the rules

04 February 2010 / Simon Young
Issue: 7403 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Simon Young underlines the importance of updating partnership agreements

It is often said, in the context of partnership disputes, that the partnership agreement is unlikely to be of help since, by definition, by the time you get the agreement out of the safe to investigate what it says about an issue, the problem has already gone beyond the possibility of reconciliation. One valid answer to that, however, would seem to be the message is not that there should be no agreement; but that its contents should be sufficiently clear, and known to the partners generally, that it is actively in play at all times.

How, then, may a properly drafted agreement help the position?

The first point is that any body of people with close and complex relationships, which are of a high degree of significance for their lives, will all benefit if each knows what the agreed rules for the operation of their relationships are. Just as sometimes in management terms any decision may be better than none, so here any rule

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll