header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules: experts’ duty of candour

​Chris Pamplin explains how the courts might handle experts who appear to have failed in their duty

  • Solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body.
  • A recent case has suggested that expert witnesses should be subjected to similar procedures.

The ability of the court to report a failing expert to a professional body with a view to considering disciplinary procedures is long established. But it is less common for the court to conduct its own investigation into an expert’s conduct. As officers of the Supreme Court, solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body. It has been suggested in a recent case that expert witnesses should be subject to a similar procedure.

The circumstances in which solicitors can be made subject to such formal enquiries and the steps that can be taken by the court are set out in R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll