header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules: experts’ duty of candour

​Chris Pamplin explains how the courts might handle experts who appear to have failed in their duty

  • Solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body.
  • A recent case has suggested that expert witnesses should be subjected to similar procedures.

The ability of the court to report a failing expert to a professional body with a view to considering disciplinary procedures is long established. But it is less common for the court to conduct its own investigation into an expert’s conduct. As officers of the Supreme Court, solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body. It has been suggested in a recent case that expert witnesses should be subject to a similar procedure.

The circumstances in which solicitors can be made subject to such formal enquiries and the steps that can be taken by the court are set out in R

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll