header-logo header-logo

16 July 2010
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police

R (on the application of C) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2010] EWHC 1601 (Admin), [2010] All ER (D) 25 (Jul)

Section 113B(4) of the Police Act 1997 required the chief officer—on meeting a request from the secretary of state, considering the issue of an enhanced criminal record certificate—to have regard to sub-para (a), which set out a relevance test, and sub-para (b), which involved the issue of proportionality, ie setting a balance between the importance and desirability of providing information on the one hand against, on the other, the degree of interference with and the likely consequences of such interference in the private life of the person to whom the information related.

The decision was expressly that of the chief officer; context was relevant; there was no presumption to be made against disclosure and nor was there a presumption to be made in favour of disclosure; the balance required by proportionality necessitated a close attention by the decision-maker to detail; relevant in striking the balance was the force of the accusations; and it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll